Search

Opinion News

Journal editorial, 10-30: Cell phone tax fair taxation

Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

The gross receipts tax on wireless telecommunications services (i.e., cell phones) brings in $8.5 million, 40 percent of which is distributed to counties. It's not a lot of money when compared to the state's annual budget, but the amount of revenue that would be lost if voters approve Initiated Measure 8 is not the main issue. Should companies that do business in South Dakota pay their fair share of taxes to operate in the state?

The out-of-state cell phone companies, which paid to get Initiative 8 on the ballot, say the gross receipts tax is an unfair double tax that applies only to cell phone companies.

That's not entirely true. The gross receipts tax is assessed against wireless communications companies and small telephone companies instead of property taxes. Because cell phone companies don't need to own a lot of property in South Dakota to do business here, they wouldn't pay as much in property taxes as the telephone companies they compete against for communications services.

Large communications companies pay a centrally assessed property tax. The gross receipts tax attempts to level the taxation playing field so that communications companies of all sizes pay at approximately the same rate of taxation.

Ultimately, consumers pay all taxes in the form of higher prices for goods and services. Wireless communications companies charge their customers a 4 percent gross receipts tax, which appears on most phone bills. Communications companies that pay the centrally assessed property tax also pass that tax along to their customers, although it doesn't appear as a separate item on their phone bill.

Everyone who uses a telephone or a cell phone ultimately pays either the centrally assessed property tax or the gross receipts tax.

If voters approve Initiative 8 on Nov. 7, cell phone companies will have a competitive advantage over traditional phone companies because they won't have to charge the gross receipts tax to their customers. There's no guarantee that cell phone companies won't keep the tax break through higher service charges.

It's irrelevant to compare cell phone taxes in South Dakota with other states. It's more to the point to compare cell phone taxes with those paid by other communications companies doing business in South Dakota, which supporters of Initiative 8 do not do. Initiative 8 doesn't repeal a tax paid by all communications companies, just cell phone companies. In our view, cell phone companies and users won't be paying their fair share of taxes to support needed government services if Initiative 8 passes. The gross receipts tax on wireless communications services is fair taxation.

Our position is a No vote on Initiated Measure 8.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement