Search

Local News

Lawrence County Commission tables feedlot permit decision

Krautschuns will work with county on layout of feedlot.

Previous Next
Previous Page
Share
Print
Email

DEADWOOD -- The Lawrence County Commission will wait until Feb. 10 to decide up or down on a conditional use permit for a cattle feedlot expansion north of Spearfish.

Commissioners held a public hearing Tuesday, Dec. 30, in Deadwood for an audience of about 50 people to debate the merits of whether or not to allow more than 1,000 cattle to be penned up on the Two Tone Cattle Company lots north of Interstate 90 Exit 8.

Owners Harvey and Bart Krautschun said cattle would be fed on 48 acres, with wastewater being held in a pond on the property. They have been feeding less than 1,000 head of cows in a small operation since 2005.

They would like to keep up to 4,000 head of cows from October through April. About two feedlot trucks a day would travel county roads and groundwater protection measures exceed state standards, Two Tone attorney Ken Barker said.

South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources has withheld a surface water discharge permit pending a county CUP decision.

Some neighbors spoke in favor and other neighbors talked against the expansion during Tuesday's two-hour hearing at Deadwood City Hall.

Proponents included Harvey Keene, Diane Miller, Clint Ridley and Rob Eddy. Keene said the value-added ag operation creates a diverse economy for Lawrence County.

Opponents that spoke on Tuesday included Alan and Marla Loken, Lucille Cudmore, Layton Lensegrav, Jim Jennings and Dan Vapland.

The Lokens, who live about 50 feet from the cattle pens, have received a reduction in property taxes from the county for decreased valuation on their property because of the feedlot.

Alan Loken said that swarming flies and water concerns on their property are ongoing, especially if the cattle numbers triple in the expansion. Marla Loken said that while relations with the Krautschuns are amicable, they are skeptical about the expansion project.

“We know they have the best intentions to take away those effects (flies and odor),” Marla Loken said. “We don’t know if that is possible.”

Others who said they were neither for nor against the project included Eric Jennings, Belle Fourche City Engineer Terry Wolterstorff and U.S. Geologic Survey water researcher Dan Driscoll.

Wolterstorff said the city of Belle Fourche has not taken a stance on the project, but has instead requested a DENR study that proves the water quality would not be impacted. “Our water supply comes from a very delicate area,” he said.

Driscoll has published government studies on the underground plumbing of the water tables in Lawrence County. He showed maps that depict the feedlot area is on top of sands and gravels along Spearfish Creek. “This is the most sensitive area relative to the distance to groundwater,” Driscoll said.

County Commissioner Bob Ewing expanded Driscoll’s analysis.

“I keep hoping for scientific information where you reassure me this isn’t going to hurt the water table,” Ewing told the Krautschuns.

Bart Krautschun explained, “We are 1-1/2 miles downstream from the (Belle Fourche water) intake. The Spearfish City Rubble Dump is across the creek from the water intake.”

Commissioner Jim Seward, whose term ended Dec. 31, said the county has a higher level of responsibility than the state regulators.

“The state is remiss in not addressing the day-to-day (cattle) urination,” Seward said. He said the catch ponds are designed for control of runoff from heavy rains, not regular accumulation of animal waste.

Commissioners voted 4-1 to delay a decision until Feb. 10. They have 45 days from Dec. 30 to make a decision. The Krautschuns will exchange information with Lawrence County Planning Director Amber Vogt during the next six weeks, with the goal of providing commissioners with additional information about proposed permit conditions and engineers' drawings of the proposed layout of the project.

Commissioner Jim Seward, whose term ended Dec. 31, voted against tabling. His successor Daryl Johnson will take office today, Jan. 6.

Bart Krautschun said his company is still working to get a permit. “We’re dong what we can to make this the best operations we can,” he said. “It’s land we own and we’re willing to work towards a goal with the county, but we have to work hand-in-hand.”

The Krautschuns and Vogt will go over terms and conditions of a proposed CUP in the coming weeks to develop a new presentation for Feb. 10.

Rapid Reply

Send us your Rapid Reply

(optional)
   
The preceeding are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

The opinions above are from readers of rapidcityjournal.com and in no way represent the views of the Rapid City Journal or Lee Enterprises.

Rapidcityjournal.com provides this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps...

  • you called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  • you rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  • YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  • you named a business or identified a business in a way good or bad. Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns or your praise – they’ll likely appreciate your feedback.
  • you believe the newspaper's coverage is unfair. It would be better to write Jerry Steinley at jerry.steinley@rapidcityjournal.com or call him at 394-8427. This is a forum for community discussion, not for media criticism. We'd rather address your concerns directly.
  • you included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  • you accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  • your comment is in really poor taste.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Top Jobs

Featured Dealers

Newspaper Ads

RCJ Extras

Advertisement