Daugaard weighs concealed carry bill

2012-03-02T10:45:00Z 2012-03-02T20:04:56Z Daugaard weighs concealed carry billDavid Montgomery Journal staff Rapid City Journal
March 02, 2012 10:45 am  • 

Gov. Dennis Daugaard has some concerns about a bill to let South Dakotans carry concealed weapons without a permit, but is leaning toward signing it.

The governor read that measure, HB 1248, Friday morning and plans to listen to past testimony about the bill before making his decision. He’s particularly interested in concerns raised by law enforcement agencies, saying he “generally (tries) to support law enforcement.”

But the governor also frequently says he’s an active supporter of gun rights, and that feeling may come out on top with HB 1248.

“I may not sign it, but I am inclined to do so,” Daugaard said.

Contact David Montgomery at 394-8329 or david.montgomery@rapidcityjournal.com

 

Copyright 2015 Rapid City Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(7) Comments

  1. SportGunner
    Report Abuse
    SportGunner - March 03, 2012 11:27 am
    There will be little change for law enforcement in the field and concerns are mostly without merit. Officers operate a constant risk-assessment loop. Officers won't suddenly become more able to detect concealed weapons, nor are citizens likely to disclose whether or not they are armed any more than they already do.

    Verifying that an armed citizen doesn't have a firearms disability may take some additional time. However, how many officers verify the validity of a permit now, or check to see if there has been a new firearms disability since issuance of the permit?

    For the public at large, nothing changes. They remain oblivious to lawfully and unlawfully armed citizens in their presence now.

    Look at the experience of AK, AZ, MT, WY, and VT.

    Sign the bill.
  2. REGULARGUY
    Report Abuse
    REGULARGUY - March 03, 2012 5:12 am
    Mr. Dauguaard, It was the people of SD that put you into office and not your "law enforcement guys". If they had their way only cops and bad guys would have guns. Just remember, from the beginning of the founding of this country "we the people" have carried guns for protection. Police officers are an after the fact response team and rarely are on scene when needed. I understand law enforcement's concerns, it is common sense that this law will have little bearing on the criminal element among us, they will have guns regardless of the law. This law conjures up thoughts of the old west when everybody carried a gun. I believe this law will have more positive impact by giving our citizens protection when they need it, not when the cops show up...often to late.
  3. SVinRC
    Report Abuse
    SVinRC - March 02, 2012 5:34 pm
    I have a permit, have had it for almost a decade and went in for it on the day I turned 18. My husband doesn't have a permit and never has. We both are avid gun users and shoot for fun and we hunt as well. If either of us were pulled over the first thing we would do is let the officer know that we were carrying, concealed or otherwise. I think the Gov. should sign this bill for the law abiding South Dakotans like my husband, who love their guns and their freedoms.
  4. 23bb2010
    Report Abuse
    23bb2010 - March 02, 2012 2:37 pm
    Think about it. People who are planning to do bad have nothing to do with permits or not because they will do it regardless. This is for the rest of us. It is proving we still have rights under the original intention of the constitution which should make people happy. We should not have to pay a fee to "bear arms" which this will eliminate so it is a good bill. What if you had to pay a fee to enter a church? There would be an uproar. Applies the same here, paying fees to exercise a right is backwards.
  5. BobJones
    Report Abuse
    BobJones - March 02, 2012 12:23 pm
    Sign it and let's move on with our lives. If you want to talk about bad legislation, how about a discussion of ObamaCare?
  6. shunkaska
    Report Abuse
    shunkaska - March 02, 2012 12:17 pm
    The "gangsters" are already caring concealed, not going thru NICS background. Bill are only for law abbiding anyway, why would it matter if the 99% that don't break laws can carry concealed...I have a permit,big deal..
  7. Ranger01
    Report Abuse
    Ranger01 - March 02, 2012 11:33 am
    Go ahead and sign it so it will resolve the problem. Wait a minute; is there a problem? I haven't heard anyone argue that the current law is flawed. It's a non issue but if it makes a few people happy go ahead and sign it. I've seen much worse bills passed. Thank goodness session is about over.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate subscription button gif

Deals, Offers and Events

Poll

Loading…

Businesses are refusing to sell the Confederate flag after the shooting that killed nine in South Carolina. Do you agree with their decision?

View Results

Recent Blog Posts

New strip mall shopping center finishing up and ready for lease

Workers are just putting the finishing touches on a new retail or business strip mall at 651 E. Anamosa St. opposite of a First Interstate Ban…

10 hours ago(0)

State campground use is up

Doug Hofer, director for the state Division of Parks and Recreation, reported this afternoon that campground use is 8 percent higher year to d…

July 01, 2015 4:38 pm(0)

MONSTRR

MONSTRR

MONSTRR = monster

July 01, 2015 9:08 am(0)

Northern Electric objects to Dakota Access request

Dakota Access, the proposed pipeline that would carry North Dakota crude oil through South Dakota to points beyond where there is processing a…

July 01, 2015 8:53 am(0)

Hunters: Reduce turkey take, add SF goose hunt

The written comments provided so far to the state Game, Fish and Parks Commission run strongly in favor reducing the fall turkey kill in the B…

July 01, 2015 8:52 am(0)