Group: BLM ecological study flawed due to politics

2011-11-30T22:05:00Z Group: BLM ecological study flawed due to politicsThe Associated Press The Associated Press
November 30, 2011 10:05 pm  • 

CHEYENNE, Wyo. -- An environmental group on Wednesday accused the U.S. Bureau of Land Management of neglecting science in favor of politics while the agency conducts six ecological studies covering millions of acres and a variety of landscapes across the West.

The BLM ignored concerns raised by scientists by not evaluating livestock grazing as one of the most significant causes of environmental change on Western public lands, the group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility wrote in a complaint filed with the BLM.

The group says the BLM did so out of fear of backlash, including the threat of litigation, from the livestock industry. The complaint quoted as evidence the minutes of a workshop the BLM held in Colorado last year to plan one of the regional studies.

"The idea that you could do an ecological map of the West and ignore grazing is preposterous," PEER executive director Jeff Ruch said.

Interior Department spokesman Adam Fetcher said the department would review the complaint under its scientific integrity policy.

The complaint centers on six "rapid ecoregional assessments" covering 12 states. Since last year the BLM has been working on seven assessments, including one in Alaska not included in the complaint, with help from federal economic stimulus funding.

The BLM plans to use the assessments to guide public land management after they're completed next year. They draw from existing data to evaluate how four "change agents" - climate change, wildfires, invasive species and human development - are affecting ecosystems.

Livestock grazing wasn't included as a change agent despite the fact that it is allowed on two-thirds of all BLM lands, or a total of 157 million acres, according to PEER.

"This is, from what we can tell, the biggest scientific effort ever undertaken by the BLM. And they've got it all wrong," Ruch said.

The BLM held a workshop in Lakewood, Colo., last year to discuss plans for an assessment covering the Colorado Plateau in Colorado, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico. The manager of the rapid ecoregional assessment program, Karl Ford, said at the meeting that livestock grazing was contentious, BLM officials were concerned about litigation, and that including grazing could put a stop to future regional assessments, according to the PEER complaint.

Workshop participants then discussed how much emphasis would be put on grazing. One participant said the BLM would be "laughed out of the room" if it didn't include grazing.

"If you have the other range of disturbances, you have to include grazing," Tom Edwards, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist and peer reviewer for the assessment, was quoted as saying in the meeting minutes obtained by PEER.

Later, the BLM decided that any analysis of data on livestock grazing would be incorporated into data on grazing by other animals, such as antelope and wild horses.

"BLM not only decided they weren't going to look at grazing as a change agent even though there's a massive amount of grazing going on those public lands, but even went further and said grazing information could only be reported in an undistinguished lump where you had to put all ungulates together," Ruch said.

The BLM ultimately has given relatively low-impact activities, such as rock hounding, more weight in its assessments than grazing, he said.

The six assessments cover portions of a dozen states: Montana, the Dakotas, Nebraska, Wyoming, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, California, Arizona and New Mexico.

This is the second complaint PEER has filed this year under the Interior Department's new scientific integrity rules. A previous complaint focused on the suspension of a wildlife biologist who studies polar bears.


Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. engineercsm
    Report Abuse
    engineercsm - December 01, 2011 12:58 pm
    badhand said: "To Mountmore, I would much rather have green than grey slug. The 'greenies' as you call them are the ones trying to save this planet from humans that would consume and destroy it. "

    Do you honestly beleive that the lands in question have never been grazed on at one time by more Bison then cattle now. You people that are bent on trying to save yourself from yourself never cease to amaze me. There are so many examples of man's intervention, by trying to manage the environment, that have turned out all wrong. How do you manage nature?

  2. badhand
    Report Abuse
    badhand - December 01, 2011 8:28 am
    To Mountmore, I would much rather have green than grey slug. The 'greenies' as you call them are the ones trying to save this planet from humans that would consume and destroy it.
  3. Rush Mountmore
    Report Abuse
    Rush Mountmore - December 01, 2011 3:14 am
    One more example of "greenies" attacking our food an energy supplies in their war on civilization and humanity.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Deals, Offers and Events



The Rapid City mayoral election is about a month away. Who are you leaning toward voting for at this point in the race?

View Results

Recent Blog Posts

Schwarting chosen for national election panel

Jerry Schwarting, the Mellette County auditor now in his third term, last week received responsibility to serve as one of nine executive board…

17 hours ago(0)

Some big changes coming to DSU

Among the items to be discussed Tuesday at a special meeting of the state Board of Regents are two significant developments at Dakota State Un…

17 hours ago(0)

New video-lottery machines are producing more

Other newsworthy matters prevented me from attending the strategic planning session held by the South Dakota Lottery Commission last month. Bu…

May 05, 2015 7:55 am(1)

Two Omaha Street businesses call it quits

Two Omaha Street businesses call it quits

Certainly there's no connection, other than location, but two businesses in separate plazas on West Omaha Street across from the executive gol…

May 04, 2015 1:40 pm(3)



NMBR 95 = No. 95

May 04, 2015 12:29 pm(1)