Democratic House candidate Matt Varilek hammered Rep. Kristi Noem over the stalled progress of the farm bill at their first debate Wednesday.

But Noem swung right back, accusing Varilek of supporting expansive government and a cap-and-trade program.

The encounter, at the Dakotafest ag show in Mitchell, was the first of four debates the two have agreed to so far. Varilek, a relative unknown who has worked as an economic development specialist for Sen. Tim Johnson, tried to seize the opportunity to challenge Noem's record on ag issues.

"The House leadership chooses not to bring (the farm bill for a vote), and our one member of Congress is a member of that leadership," Varilek said, referring to Noem.

He repeatedly returned to the farm bill, accusing Noem of not supporting an effort to force a vote and of not being vocal at meetings of the House Agriculture Committee.

"We might not be in this situation if my opponent had been more focused on ag issues longer ago," Varilek said.

Noem defended her record, arguing she was working hard to pass a farm bill and that it was the fault of Congressional Democrats that the bill hasn't yet passed. She accused Varilek of lying and making up facts.

"There was so much spin in that story that Matt almost fell out of his chair," Noem said after Varilek criticized her position on forcing a vote on the farm bill. While Noem chose not to lead that effort, she said Wednesday she plans to support it if there's still no progress when Congress reconvenes in September.

Varilek, too, accused Noem of untruths. When she attacked him for allegedly supporting a cap-and-trade system to control carbon emissions, Varilek said Noem's accusations were "just false, folks."

After the debate, Varilek said he does not support cap and trade or an energy tax, and never had.

The exchange over cap and trade was part of a broader effort by Noem to paint a picture of Varilek as a champion of big government.

"My opponent wants to give the government more control over your farm ... (and) businesses," Noem said. "He wants to tax you more. He wants to spend more. He wants more EPA, and he wants more of a government-controlled society."

Varilek responded by saying he was a champion of the middle class, not bigger government.

The two candidates agreed on several issues, although both followed that by pivoting to differences. Both said they supported country-of-origin labeling and liked the U.S. Senate's version of the farm bill's commodity program, which is friendlier to northern crops such as corn and wheat than the House version. Both also opposed proposals to grant a waiver from a requirement to blend ethanol into gasoline and to scrap the federal Conservation Reserve Program.

But the two clashed over a range of issues:

  • Estate tax: Noem called to end the estate tax, saying she didn't believe "death should be a taxable event," especially since that money already had been taxed as income. Varilek said an estate tax should be applied to the truly wealthy – citing Bill Gates, Donald Trump and Paris Hilton – but called for small businessmen and family farms to be exempt from such a tax.
  • Medicare: Varilek criticized a Medicare plan, authored by Republican vice presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan, as privatizing Medicare at the expense of future senior citizens. Noem defended that plan for offering seniors a choice about their health care plan, and said it was a way to save Medicare from going bankrupt.
  • Food stamps: Noem supports changes to the federal food stamp program, included in the House version of the farm bill, that would save billions of dollars. She said the reforms would ensure only people who need the food aid would get it. Varilek said those changes went too far and would hurt families who rely on those programs.

Both candidates brought plenty of supporters to the debate, leading to regular cheers and jeers from a lively crowd. Debate moderator Jerry Oster of WNAX Radio in Yankton asked the crowd to let the candidates talk on several occasions.

The debate was sponsored in part by the South Dakota Corn Growers and South Dakota State University.

(2) comments


I would like to hear or read what each candidate has to say about Veterans Healthcare and Education. I've read ND Senatorial Candidate Heidi Heitcamp's idea about creating a "Hero's Card" for Veterans so we won't have to travel hundreds of miles to get our medical needs taken care of. I drive for the Veterans and it's a chore to drive to Sturgis, Fargo, Fort Snelling, Sioux Falls or Omaha to get medical attention.
Gubernatorial Candidate Ryan Taylor ND has a plan for ND schools, college students, and student loans which sounds good. I wish our hopefuls would talk about their ideas on education and Veterans issues.
I would lose interest if this turned into a Negative campaign like the Presidential campaign has...


Noem said, "My opponent wants to give the government more control over your farm ... (and) businesses," Noem said. "He wants to tax you more. He wants to spend more. He wants more EPA, and he wants more of a government-controlled society." One should look at Noems vote on May 18 2012 when kristi voted to keep "indifinite detention" in the NDAA act. Kristi and the House voted down the Smith-Amash amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which would have prohibited the government from indefinitely detaining U.S. citizens without trial. A vote of 182-237 struck down the bipartisan Amendment that Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and Justin Amash (R-Mich.) introduced. Only 19 Republicans, compared to 163 Democrats, supported the bill. While Obama has pledged not to use his power to enforce indefinite detention in the United States, the legislation still paves the way for future Presidents to do exactly that. Rep. Smith explained the importance of his legislation: This is an extraordinary amount of power to give the president – to give the government the power to take away people’s rights and to lock them up without so much as a court hearing. By rejecting this amendment, Kristi and the House of Representatives failed in their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law.” You can see the vote number 270 at on May 18th. It was Kristi and the republicans that voted wrong against the rights of Americans. Now Kristi who wants a government controlled society? It appears it is you.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.