Hunting fee hike for predator control moves along

2013-03-01T07:30:00Z Hunting fee hike for predator control moves alongBob Mercer Legislative correspondent Rapid City Journal
March 01, 2013 7:30 am  • 

PIERRE | The Legislature has one step left for final approval of an additional $1 surcharge on hunting licenses in South Dakota to help raise more money for predator control.

There also is a movement under way to increase the amounts that county predator districts can levy on livestock producers.

The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee endorsed both measures Thursday. Their prime sponsor is Rep. Betty Olson, R-Prairie City.

The $1 surcharge for hunters could come up for debate by the full Senate on Monday. It sailed through the Senate hearing on a 7-1 vote, with Chris Hesla of the South Dakota Wildlife Federation the only witness testifying against it.

Hunters already pay a $5 surcharge on most licenses for animal-damage control and public hunting access. Hesla said hunters are paying more than their fair share in comparison to landowners.

State Wildlife Division Director Tony Leif said the additional dollar would generate about $320,000 on top of the approximately $900,000 currently in the Animal Damage Control budget of the Game, Fish & Parks Department. Leif said the coyote population is up and he could put more boots on the ground and in the air for more hours.

“This is a viable solution,” he said.

Leif said he also supports the $300,000 one-time funding that Senate Republican leader Russ Olson of Wentworth has proposed. That bill will be discussed Monday by the House Appropriations Committee.

Leif said that money would come in time “to get right after the problem this spring” until the $1 surcharge starts producing more revenue this fall.

Several senators didn’t take kindly to Hesla’s position, nor did Olson.

“There’s nobody that’s got more skin in the game than the producers right now,” she said. “We’re running out of money, and we’re running out of livestock and we’re running out of wildlife up there.”

Jene Jansen, an archery hunter from Ashton, told the committee that coyotes are numerous and don’t seem to be spooked by him in the field. But he has seen wildlife, especially deer, acting differently.

“The game has changed their tactics, and they’re living in fear of these coyotes,” he said.

Another bill was changed by the committee to allow larger levies on livestock producers for predator control.

County commissioners could collect up to $1 per sheep at least six months old and all cattle at least one year old and not in feedlots on Jan. 1 each year. The current limits are 25 cents for sheep and six cents for cattle.

The Senate panel approved those changes on a 8-1 vote. If the full Senate agrees next week, the legislation, HB1168, would need to return to the House for a decision.

Copyright 2015 Rapid City Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. just4justice
    Report Abuse
    just4justice - March 01, 2013 11:55 am
    let people get coyotes however they want and gf&p won't have to charge more money! simple
  2. just4justice
    Report Abuse
    just4justice - March 01, 2013 10:17 am
    tell game, fish and parks to stop harrassing hunters and let us hunt out of planes, on snowmobiles and spot light them at night and the coyote problem will go away without adding anymore expense to anybody who does not want to hunt them, SIMPLE
  3. common_sense
    Report Abuse
    common_sense - March 01, 2013 8:02 am
    And so it has come full circle back to the hunters. First groups like PETA opposed the selling of furs causing the value of predators to plummet. Now hunters dont go after them because it is too costly. Ironically though HUNTERS are being FORCED to pay for the reduction of predators now. Where are all the "fees" that PETA and other anti hunting groups should be paying to fix thier mistakes? As a hunter I strongly oppose this fee. If hunters are going to pay for the cleanup it should be in the form of a bounty so that we at least have the opportunity to make a buck instead of simply paying more and more for our right to hunt. Fine PETA instead and leave us alone.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate subscription button gif

Poll

Loading…

Fur-Ever Wild was just approved to keep wolf cubs and fox kits at a wildlife education center in Deadwood. Do you agree with the South Dakota Animal Industry Board's ruling?

View Results

Recent Blog Posts

Beam me up

Beam me up

Sometimes, the every-day grind of photojournalism leads to some less-than-spectacular assignments. Last week, I was sent out to Summerset to t…

4 hours ago(0)

Valley Queen disputes Otter Tail’s pricing

The state Public Utilities Commission never seems to have a dull day of late. The latest dispute to land in the laps of commissioners Chris Ne…

9 hours ago(0)

Cosmetology commission gets new members

Gov. Dennis Daugaard appointed Laurie Brandner of Pierre and Crystal Carlson of Beresford to the state Cosmetology Commission. Carlson succeed…

May 21, 2015 7:57 am(0)

SEVERIT

SEVERIT

SEVERIT = Sever it? Really...let's hope this isn't a doctor.

May 20, 2015 8:36 am(0)

More on the Idaho connection

In addition to Jason Hancock, the executive director for the Legislative Research Council hired last year from Idaho, and Michael Rush, who st…

May 20, 2015 7:41 am(0)