WOSTER: Rounds keeps eye on 2014

2011-10-30T07:30:00Z 2011-10-31T09:08:12Z WOSTER: Rounds keeps eye on 2014Kevin Woster, Journal columnist Rapid City Journal
October 30, 2011 7:30 am  • 

Ask Mike Rounds what his campaign plans are for 2012 and he takes the coy road.

“None that I know of,” the former governor says. “I’m a businessman these days.”

The dodge takes a different turn when you ask about 2014, however.

“Oh, you never know,” Rounds says.

Rounds is right, of course. We don’t know what he’ll be doing when the 2014 campaign cycle rolls around. But we do know that Democratic U.S. Sen. Tim Johnson will be up for re-election, should the three-term senator decide to try for four.

We also know the U.S. House seat now held by Republican Kristi Noem will be in play, with Noem likely to be the incumbent considering both a House re-election race or a try for Johnson’s Senate seat.

We also know there’s a low-odds possibility that Noem could get beat in her re-election bid for the House next year. And we could see former Democratic Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin get back in the game, depending on Noem’s standing with voters and Tim Johnson’s plans.

And Rounds? He’s a threat at any level of political campaign in South Dakota. And the fact that he has a new political action committee — named the Peter Norbeck PAC — leads some to believe he’s more than a little likely to make a run for something in a few years.

“I think the creation of a PAC is an indication that Rounds is looking at doing something in 2014,” says John Schaff, a political science professor at Northern State University in Aberdeen. “It doesn’t take much imagination to guess that he has his eyes on the Johnson Senate seat.”

Some think Johnson’s son, Brendan, the U.S. attorney in Sioux Falls, has his eyes on the same seat, should his dad decide that 28 years in Congress, including five House terms, is enough.

Rounds steers around those points of interest when asked about the purpose of the Norbeck PAC. He says his primary goal with the committee is to raise money for other Republican candidates going into 2012.

“We’ve got a huge number of Republicans in the state Legislature today,” Rounds says. “When it comes time to fund their campaigns, there’s going to be a huge demand for donations.”

Rounds had more than $250,000 in his own campaign account to start the year.

He’ll transfer some to jump start the PAC, then solicit donations. He chose Norbeck’s name after consulting with descendants of the early 20th-century South Dakota governor and U.S. senator, whom Rounds greatly admires.

It’s an interesting choice of names.

Norbeck represented the progressive wing of the Republican Party way back when. He wasn’t afraid to put government to work in ways that would trouble conservative South Dakota Republicans of today.

They don’t much trouble Rounds.

“Rounds as governor was clearly comfortable using government as an instrument of economic development. We certainly saw that in higher education,” Schaff says. “One can only assume that Rounds doesn’t want to position himself as a stridently anti-government Republican. If he has designs on Johnson’s Senate seat, he’ll have to show he is able and willing to ‘bring home the bacon’ in terms of South Dakota pork.”

These days Rounds is more worried about bringing home the pheasants. But in time, he’s almost certain to take aim at other moving targets.

One could be that U.S. Senate seat.

Contact Kevin Woster at 394-8413 or Kevin.woster@rapidcityjournal.com



Copyright 2015 Rapid City Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. a-rodd
    Report Abuse
    a-rodd - November 05, 2011 1:42 pm
    johnson isnt getting voted in again neither is herseth, all u need to do is remind people johnson could have stopped obama care, he alone could have. rounds has him beat hands down if he runs. and not to mention rounds did a alright job as governor, and i dont think he would have ever voted for obama care.
  2. Progstopper
    Report Abuse
    Progstopper - October 31, 2011 12:29 pm
    When the left runs out of punching bags they always find some way to make up new ones. What does it matter to anyone if Rounds runs for office or not in 2014. The last time I looked South Dakota was still a part of the USA and the USA is still free and the voting booth ensures we stay that way. Come on people learn to pick your battles.

    I do want to point out that MacGregor's comment about "brain damaged" Sen. Johnson was over the top. I do not agree with Johnson's politics, but if the majority of voters puts him back in office I guess we will deal with it.
  3. shunkaska
    Report Abuse
    shunkaska - October 30, 2011 10:01 pm
    Mike don't worry the few % of haters out their couldn't control on outcome in their neighborhoods. If you would run we, the vast majority of the state would get you there. Thank you and you greta family for the sacrifices you have made for this great state...
  4. Bruce Whalen
    Report Abuse
    Bruce Whalen - October 30, 2011 2:38 pm
    If a campaign stategy is to elect more of the same in DC then voters need to look elsewhere. We already know what same ol' same ol' got us.
  5. Cummalitive Points
    Report Abuse
    Cummalitive Points - October 30, 2011 11:00 am
    Rounds accomplished nothing as governor, except to keep his family employed, closed government and political favors. He is a big government proponet. I will start my campaign now, DON'T VOTE for Mike.
  6. MacGregor
    Report Abuse
    MacGregor - October 30, 2011 8:00 am
    Smilin' Mike has always been a big-government Republican and the only reason this conservative would ever vote for him is if the choice was between either Rounds or the brain damaged Sen. Johnson. Really - is this the best South Dakota can do?
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick