EDITORIAL: Farm Bill undermines FOIA

2013-11-07T07:30:00Z EDITORIAL: Farm Bill undermines FOIAJournal editorial board Rapid City Journal
November 07, 2013 7:30 am  • 

House and Senate conferees are continuing to meet to resolve the differences between the House and Senate versions of the 2013 Farm Bill. We received a copy of a letter to the conferees from the National Freedom of Information Coalition, calling attention to a provision in the House bill that would undermine the Freedom of Information Act.

According to the letter, the House version requires the federal government to withhold information about agricultural and livestock operations, and a coalition of public information groups and others are urging the conference committee to strip out the language that affects the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Language in the House bill is an apparent reaction to an incident earlier this year when the Environmental Protection Agency improperly disclosed private information about confined animal feeding operations to several environmental groups. The EPA asked that the information be returned, and the groups complied. However, the EPA did not tell the agricultural operators until after it became public that their personal information had been sent out -- including names, addresses, geographic coordinates, permit numbers, numbers and types of animals, phone numbers, names and addresses of employees and, in some cases, lists of deceased family members.

The improperly disclosed producer information involved 80,000 livestock operations in the country, including more than 500 producers in South Dakota.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., wrote a column in April objecting to the EPA’s actions. He wrote:

“Nowhere in law is the EPA required to obtain and display such personal information; on the contrary, the federal government should be protecting its citizens from unwarranted attacks. Instead, the EPA has threatened the health and safety of South Dakota’s ag producers and their families, and has decreased the security of our food system.”

The National Freedom of Information Coalition letter states that the House provision is unnecessary to protect the information of individuals and small family farms, and that because the language is “exceedingly broad and vague,” it would prevent disclosure of any information about large corporations, including where they operate.

We oppose any weakening of the Freedom of Information Act that bars the disclosure of information that the public has a right to know in an over-reaction to the EPA’s improper disclosure of producer information earlier this year. The EPA acknowledged its mistake and has made assurances that it would not happen again.

We also recognize that the federal government collects a lot of information about individuals, private groups and small and large corporations, and it should take better care to ensure the security of that information.

There must be a balance between the public’s right to know about the government and the security of private, personal information of individuals and small ag operations that government holds. The House Farm Bill goes too far, in our view, by preventing the disclosure of any information about large-scale agricultural operations, some of which the public absolutely has a right to know about.

Copyright 2015 Rapid City Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(7) Comments

  1. Shorty
    Report Abuse
    Shorty - November 09, 2013 9:28 am
    I would have, but this article is only about the house, I do agree that they all need the wakeup call.
  2. farmer
    Report Abuse
    farmer - November 09, 2013 8:18 am
    Is this what tyranny looks like ?
  3. Obtuseangler
    Report Abuse
    Obtuseangler - November 08, 2013 7:53 am
    Correct, Farwalker. It seems to be OK with some folks to criticize a political party acting through the government, but if we criticize the government all to often we are accused of being unpatriotic anarchists. The list of government agencies breaking the law is long, EPA, IRS, ATF, and DOJ to name a few, but the list of those prosecuted is non-existent.
  4. Farwalker
    Report Abuse
    Farwalker - November 07, 2013 11:49 am
    The EPA is criminally liable is how I read this.
    instead of putting the blame on repubs we should all be focusing on the fact that the people in our government are violating our laws without worry of prosecution
  5. Deklan
    Report Abuse
    Deklan - November 07, 2013 10:18 am
    There's not enough sunshine in the payouts of subsidies in the Farm Bill.

    Dimming anymore info will leave the taxpayers in the dark.
  6. farmer
    Report Abuse
    farmer - November 07, 2013 8:50 am
    Shorty you should have said the house and senate and executive branch trying to keep information from the public. "Behind closed door meeting" we here it all the time 1
  7. Shorty
    Report Abuse
    Shorty - November 07, 2013 8:14 am
    The house republicans trying to keep information from the public? Say it's not so. Nothing has changed, the only way it will change is if we, as voters, give them all a wakeup call at the ballot box.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick



Which Republican presidential candidate has your vote at this point in the race?

View Results

Recent Blog Posts

In the dungeon

In the dungeon

The Dungeon Bar in Sturgis is certainly aptly named.  It's dark and houses some suspect characters.

3 hours ago(0)



FREED 59  = We don't know what this one means. Any ideas?

8 hours ago(0)

Willie G. Davidson

Willie G. Davidson

Willie G. Davidson, grandson of William Davidson co-founder of Harley-Davidson, popped into great fans during the official opening of the Harl…

July 31, 2015 4:51 pm(0)



WRLDPCE = world peace

July 31, 2015 8:45 am(0)

Lottery Commission re-elects leaders

Two former legislators will hold the leadership seats on the South Dakota Lottery Commission for another year. Commission members re-elected C…

July 31, 2015 7:54 am(0)