Rounds prepares for conservative GOP challenge

2013-06-23T05:30:00Z Rounds prepares for conservative GOP challengeKevin Woster Journal staff Rapid City Journal
June 23, 2013 5:30 am  • 

Former Gov. Mike Rounds is prepared to spend up to $9 million in his U.S. Senate campaign, with a good chunk of it likely to be used to fend off attacks from hard-right conservatives in an expected Republican primary.

Rounds, who is seen by some conservatives as too moderate on taxes and size-of-government issues, argues that his conservative credentials are strong. And he believes the core of Republican conservatives in South Dakota support his campaign.

"The vast majority of conservatives in the South Dakota Republican Party are in our camp right now," Rounds said during a stop in Rapid City last week.

He refers to some of his critics on the conservative side as "professional dissenters. Their claim to fame is dissention."

Whatever he calls his critics, Rounds expects to be challenged in the primary by a candidate or candidates who will benefit from outside money attacking the former governor and his record. That will be repeated in the general election, he said.

“We’ll get hit from the special-interests groups,” Rounds said. “We’re prepared for that. And we’re prepared to respond.”

If a primary challenge develops as expected, it could define a Republican Party in South Dakota that has thrown off ultra-conservative splinter factions who don't consider Rounds to be one of them.

Those factions are considered long shots to carry a primary against a formidable party leader like Rounds. Nonetheless, he prepares for them with good reason, according to political science professor Jon Schaff from Northern State University in Aberdeen.

Schaff said a challenge from an effective conservative candidate could coalesce right-wing factions and attract meaningful support from national conservative groups.

"It seems pretty clear to me that at least some people are sniffing around to see if some outside money will come in and run an insurgency candidate against Mike Rounds," Schaff said. "I suspect he's more worried about a primary run than he is about the general election."

Rounds has reason to worry, said state Rep. Stace Nelson, a Republican from Fulton and a frequent critic of Rounds, current Gov. Dennis Daugaard and the Republican establishment.

Nelson rejects Rounds' contention that the former governor has strong support from conservatives.

"I can't name one real conservative in the state of South Dakota who is in Rounds' camp," Nelson said. "He's trying to recreate himself."

Nelson said Rounds had "an atrocious record" while governor, allowing government to expand, ballooning a structural budget deficit that topped $100 million and readily relying on federal stimulus dollars that conservatives abhorred.

"The fact that he needs $9 million to run in South Dakota should tell you that he knows his record is poor and he needs all that money to distract South Dakotans from his record," Nelson said.

Nelson hasn't yet decided if he will run for the U.S. Senate, but he is considering it. He said he has been contacted by the Tea Party Express, the Club for Growth and the Senate Conservative Fund.

Schaff said a candidate like Nelson might energize conservatives and attract substantial support from out-of-state groups.

"I'd say Stace Nelson has a better chance of beating Mike Rounds than Rick Weiland (the announced Democratic candidate) does," Schaff said.

But it will be difficult for any second- or third-tier Republican candidates to upset Rounds in a primary. The popular former state Senate leader who went on to serve two terms as governor maintained high approval ratings while in office.

And he still ranks high in likability among South Dakota voters, said Bob Burns, a professor emeritus in political science from South Dakota State University in Brookings.

Rounds' refusal to sign pledges saying he would never support tax increase might rankle the hard right but it wins support as common-sense philosophy with voters overall, Burns said.

"It looks more and more like Rounds will win the Republican nomination and Rick Weiland will win the Democratic nomination, and the two will meet in the general," he said.

Weiland is a Sioux Falls businessman who lost in runs for the U.S. House in 1996 and 2002. He is the only Democrat to have announced for the seat now held by Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson, who decided not to run for a fourth Senate term in 2014.

Weiland is considered to be a pronounced underdog against Rounds. An expensive, bristly Republican primary could only help the seemingly outmatched Democrat, although Weiland refuses to focus on that.

"Conventional wisdom is a GOP primary would help our campaign, but that is beyond our control," Weiland said in a comment emailed by his campaign staff. "What’s in our control is telling as many South Dakotans as possible that I don’t like $9 million campaigns. Nine-million-dollar campaigns are the reason our country has been hijacked by big money special interests."

Not long after Rounds announced his $9-million fundraising goal, Weiland issued a news release asking him to agree to limit individual contributions to $100. Rounds has rejected that, saying he is following a fundraising plan developed months ago when it was still possible that Tim Johnson would run for re-election.

Other possible candidates who decided not to run for the Senate were U.S. Rep. Noem, who was consider a formidable challenger for Rounds, former Democratic Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin and Democratic U.S. Attorney Brendan Johnson, the senator's son.

Any of them would have added to campaign costs. So will a primary with a conservative candidate, if it attracts attack advertisements from outside groups. And the same thing could occur during the general election, where independent political action committees using muscle that was increased by federal court rulings can spend unlimited amounts of money for or against a candidate.

Rounds said the advent of these Super PACs makes it all the more important for him to have campaign funding to respond to what he calls distortions and attacks. He expects that in both a primary and the general election.

"It's not the other candidates that raise all the money. It's these Super PACs that come in," Rounds said. "We will focus on our story and our message, but we must be able to respond to false information and peg those responsible for it, too."

Schaff said enough moderate congressional members have been defeated or threatened in primaries in recent years to make Rounds pay attention. The fact that primaries tend to have lower voter turnout, which can be strongly affected by voters with the most passionate ideology, is also a risk Rounds must consider, Schaff said.

But more than one primary challenger from the hard right would split the hard-right vote and weaken the impact of all, he said.

"If the people in that wing of the party are serious, then they better settle on somebody," Schaff said. "Because if they've got three people running, Mike Rounds wins for sure. One person with a lot of focus and some outside money might make something happen."

 

Contact Kevin Woster at 394-8413 or kevin.woster@rapidcityjournal.com

Copyright 2015 Rapid City Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(10) Comments

  1. Frank Smith
    Report Abuse
    Frank Smith - June 24, 2013 2:46 pm
    Conservatives are never for sale. Liberals are, though. Promise a liberal (any liberal) a freebie and you can count on their vote.
  2. beauzeau
    Report Abuse
    beauzeau - June 24, 2013 1:02 pm
    surprise, surprise, surprise, lol
  3. Report Abuse
    - June 24, 2013 10:52 am
    Nobody spoke favorably about Stace Nelson?
  4. Lorie Johnson
    Report Abuse
    Lorie Johnson - June 24, 2013 8:32 am
    No conservative would ever support Rounds. I don't think many liberals will support him either. He is a tax and spend RINO who is more socially liberal than Herseth-Sandlin. Here is a guy who spent South Dakota into a corner which played a big role in the huge problems we had over the past few years. The state is finally climbing out of the hole he dug us into.



    Rounds is George Bush lite with none of the hubris that made Bush generally likeable. The only thing Rounds has is money. In South Dakota, that's not going to be enough. You have to win the hearts and the minds of the people. It's too late for that now given his past dismal performance. The last thing we need is another RINO to give away the rest of the store (what little is left).

  5. beauzeau
    Report Abuse
    beauzeau - June 23, 2013 6:32 pm
    Know why we just voted on a State constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget?, because of Gov Rounds overspending, that amendment should be called the Mickey Rounds amendment. If we vote to send M Rounds to DC, then we really dont believe there is a budget crisis at the federal level.
  6. counting
    Report Abuse
    counting - June 23, 2013 3:50 pm
    It is easy to maintain high popularity polls when you DO NOHING while in office. Rounds obviously has the money behind him, but what will he actually do for the working class in South Dakota? From what I can tell, the only thing he did while Governor was keep special interests on his side, grow the deficit (RECORD AMOUNT), did not fix education spending, economic growth was stagnant, state government size exploded (several of his family members employed), chased a game warden away to a different state and that pretty much sums up his 8 years. Oh yeah, he tossed $35 million into the Homestake mine. It is time for South Dakota to have different leaders representing us.
  7. oldsarge
    Report Abuse
    oldsarge - June 23, 2013 12:40 pm
    9 million smackeroos should buy a few votes, I would say...especially in SD
  8. Algebra
    Report Abuse
    Algebra - June 23, 2013 10:04 am
    I recently attended a county GOP meeting (I'm not going to reveal which one) where the topic of Stace Nelson came up. NOBODY spoke favorably.
  9. Rickdm
    Report Abuse
    Rickdm - June 23, 2013 6:52 am
    politicians spend billions of dollars and then cut everything for the poor folk. But they sure make sure they get their benefits.
  10. peppermint1900
    Report Abuse
    peppermint1900 - June 23, 2013 6:16 am
    That is what is wrong with this country. It's only the ones that can raise or already have lots of money that end up running our country.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Activate subscription button gif

Deals, Offers and Events

Poll

Loading…

Which Republican presidential candidate has your vote at this point in the race?

View Results

Recent Blog Posts

Veterans outreach

The South Dakota Department of Labor and Regulation will have a veterans’ outreach representative available on Thursday, July 30, from 10 a.m.…

July 29, 2015 11:51 am(0)

Q TIP

Q TIP

Q TIP = Q tip 

July 28, 2015 8:44 am(0)

Down to the wire

Down to the wire

It looks like a successful mad scramble to finish Sturgis' new Big D convenience/Papa Johns Pizza/Arby's store in time for the Sturgis rally. …

July 27, 2015 11:47 am(0)

TZ2PLZ

TZ2PLZ

TZ2PLZ - tease to please

July 25, 2015 8:42 am(0)

New vaping business opening up

A new vaping, or e-cigarette, business is opening in Rapid City on Monday.

July 24, 2015 3:19 pm(0)