Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Gena Parkhurst

Gena Parkhurst

{{featured_button_text}}

To the Editor:

Uranium mining - at what cost to our water?

 Powertech/Azarga Uranium Corp proposes mining uranium via the in-situ leach process at Dewey-Burdock near Edgemont. Let's look at a few problems with this proposal:

• In-situ leach uranium mining is done directly in a water-bearing aquifer.

• Powertech/Azarga wants to mine two of Fall River County's largest aquifers.

• Rock layers around the mining aquifer must provide adequate confinement to prevent contamination

• Studies indicate rock layers on-site don't have adequate confinement.'

• On-site are approximately 4,000 old drill holes, many drilled before regulations required lining or closing properly; most holes conditions are unknown; at least one old drill hole leaks to the surface.

• Studies indicate water leaks between formations implicating old drill holes and fractures.

• Huge chimneys (breccia pipes) go through otherwise impermeable rock layers in the area, undermining any finding of adequate confinement.

• Potential full-scale uranium mining plan for the Black Hills will demand an inordinant extraction/ pollution of an already compromised aquifer system. While salty, aquifers to be mined are providing water for ranching, domestic use, and can be filtered for drinking.

• Powertech/Azarga would not pay a dime for the water used, and the quantity is more than the water used by Rapid City.

Gena Parkhurst

Rapid City

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
0
0
0
0
0

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alert

Breaking News