Skip to main contentSkip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
alert top story

Judgment to come in 2022 on mobile home park owners' water dispute

  • Updated
  • 0
The Ridgestone Mobile Home Community

A car sits by its home at the Ridgestone Mobile Home Community in Rapid City.

The courts are expected to issue a January judgment in a case involving the owners of a Rapid City mobile home park who are in a water dispute with the city, a Pennington County judge said Friday.

Assistant City Attorney Carla Cushman represented the city at a hearing set in the case against Rand and Gayla Williams Friday morning. Rand Williams represented himself and intended to represent Gayla as well, which Cushman objected to.

Cushman cited state law which notes that a person cannot represent another in court without a license. Williams said Gayla signed the response to the city's judgment motion filed Nov. 5 that noted he handles field operations for the Ridgestone Mobile Home Community, located at 600 Lindbergh Avenue.

"Gayla has no knowledge" of the business, Williams said.

The Williams' response was filed Friday morning. Williams presented the response to Judge Matt Brown as the hearing began. He said he provided a copy to Cushman that morning.

Brown said the city can officially respond to the Williams' response by Dec. 17 in writing and Williams can respond to the city's response by Dec. 31.

He said there will likely be a judgment issued in January.

The case

The city filed a lawsuit against the Williams family on Sept. 25, 2020 and filed the Nov. 5 summary judgment motion requesting the court make an order to require the defendants to replace their non-conforming water service line and meter pit.

The Williams signed an agreement with the city Feb. 4, 2020 that states the water meter that serves 69 mobile park homes had been non-functioning for more than 24 months. The agreement goes on to state the service line crossed another property, which does not comply with city ordinance. The existing water service could not provide an accessible or suitable location for the water meter and the city had the authority to turn off water service to the property, the agreement states.

— Contact Siandhara Bonnet at

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

For all those complaining about rising property taxes, this is what happens when you don't have state income tax.

Thank you Jerry Munson (voters were clear about cannabis) for pointing out the obvious. Something our elected officials have no clue about. Do…

The mayor has asked citizens to stay away from city offices because of the high volume of sickness in our community, but somehow we feel it co…

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alert

Breaking News