Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
editor's pick

BUSH: It is time to shine the light on state government

  • Updated

When she was a candidate, Kristi Noem promised to run the most transparent administration ever. Governor Kristi Noem has delivered a lot of things to South Dakota residents, but transparency isn't one of them.

It certainly isn't completely Gov. Noem's fault. After all, when Attorney General Jason Ravsnborg killed a man during a stretch of what can best be described as a period of distracted driving, the governor released more evidence from the investigation than any local law enforcement agency ever would.

To take government secrecy to a new level, Speaker of the House Spencer Gosch won't even release the results of the petition to see which legislators called for impeachment proceedings to begin against Ravsnborg. A petition signed by two-thirds of the House of Representatives is being hidden from the public.

That is unconscionable.

The Sioux Falls Argus Leader and South Dakota Newspaper Association have filed legal action to try to open that information to public view.

"It's inexcusable for Speaker Gosch to continue hiding this information from the public," Argus Leader News Director Cory Myers said, after attempts to work with Gosch and his attorney failed. "There's a constitutional requirement to record legislative votes, and at the very least, an obligation of elected servants to be transparent about their processes. This is basic accountability, and that's something we will always fight for."

Another area where the state fails Noem's transparency pledge is when it comes to how much state tax money goes to fly the governor around to campaign events and fundraisers across the country. When the Rapid City Journal and other news agencies sought to release those records to the public, her office hid behind the curtain of her security. The only thing transparent about that is how easy it is to see through that excuse. Of course, most states make this information available as a public record because people have a  right to know how their money is spent. No security issues have arisen in any of these states based on releasing the cost of executive branch travel.

It is time for that to change. But call me a skeptic. When Rapid City legislator Taffy Howard tried to get the bare minimum number released last session, her bill was killed in committee. All Howard tried to make public was the annual total released once a year. Secrecy prevailed.

That's hardly an outlier in South Dakota. Senate Majority Leader Gary Cammack faced charges in Meade County in 2020. Not only did he get a sweet plea deal to have a driving under the influence charge dropped to careless driving, but his case was also sealed by a friendly judge. The case reeks of political privilege and is nowhere close to transparency.

The Journal is preparing to ask another judge to reopen those files in the interest of public trust. Even in a state with relatively few open records, the court system should operate in full public view with no winks and nods and no political favors.

In a few months, legislators will be back in session. A blank slate will welcome them with another chance to reveal more secrets to the people of South Dakota.

It is time to stop hiding information in the shadows and let the sunshine of public access give people more confidence in their state government.

Gov. Noem can be a driving force in that action and help keep her campaign promise of additional transparency. She is a national figure with a cadre of legislators who are more than willing to do her bidding and praise any proposal she makes.

If she wants to create a more transparent South Dakota, she has few roadblocks in her way.

Kent Bush is the editor of the Rapid City Journal. Reach him at

Concerned about COVID-19?

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Thanksgiving – it’s the time of year where you can turn to the paper and are almost guaranteed to find a few fluffy columns about counting ble…

What a seismic difference a trial has made to public and media perceptions of Kyle Rittenhouse. When he was charged at age 17 with shooting three men, two fatally, during racial unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year, various media accounts described him as a rifle-toting white supremacist who drove across the border to shoot Black Lives Matters protesters in the racial unrest that followed ...

Michael Paul Williams — a columnist with the Richmond Times-Dispatch — won the 2021 Pulitzer Prize in Commentary "for penetrating and historically insightful columns that guided Richmond, a former capital of the Confederacy, through the painful and complicated process of dismantling the city's monuments to white supremacy."

Kyle Rittenhouse is 18 years old. On Aug. 25, 2020, when Rittenhouse killed two men during a night of civil unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, he was 17. But when he took the stand during his murder trial, he looked like he could be 13. Defendants in murder trials often do themselves no favors by testifying in their own defense, but Rittenhouse probably helped himself. He was soft-spoken and ...

What can sensible adults agree on regarding Kyle Rittenhouse, the latest young symbol on whom America can hang its devastating internal division and the newest tool for social media networks to monetize without regard to individual and societal hurt? Those who believe in the rule of law, which should be all of us, might start with the notion that a murder trial involving self-defense is no ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alert

Breaking News